Strong and Pareto Price of Anarchy in Congestion Games
نویسندگان
چکیده
Strong Nash equilibria and Pareto-optimal Nash equilibria are natural and important strengthenings of the Nash equilibrium concept. We study these stronger notions of equilibrium in congestion games, focusing on the relationships between the price of anarchy for these equilibria and that for standard Nash equilibria (which is well understood). For symmetric congestion games with polynomial or exponential latency functions, we show that the price of anarchy for strong and Pareto-optimal equilibria is much smaller than the standard price of anarchy. On the other hand, for asymmetric congestion games with polynomial latencies the strong and Pareto prices of anarchy are essentially as large as the standard price of anarchy; while for asymmetric games with exponential latencies the Pareto and standard prices of anarchy are the same but the strong price of anarchy is substantially smaller. Finally, in the special case of linear latencies, we show that the strong and Pareto prices of anarchy coincide exactly with the known value 5 2 for standard Nash, but are strictly smaller for symmetric games. Microsoft Research Silicon Valley Campus, 1065 La Avenida, Mountain View CA 94043, U.S.A. Email: [email protected]. Computer Science Division, University of California, Berkeley CA 94720-1776, U.S.A. Email: [email protected]. Supported in part by NSF grant 0635153. Work done in part while this author was visiting Microsoft Research Silicon Valley Campus.
منابع مشابه
Exact Price of Anarchy for Polynomial Congestion Games
We show exact values for the price of anarchy of weighted and unweighted congestion games with polynomial latency functions. The given values also hold for weighted and unweighted network congestion games.
متن کاملPolynomial Bottleneck Congestion Games with Optimal Price of Anarchy
We study bottleneck congestion games where the social cost is determined by the worst congestion of any resource. These games directly relate to network routing problems and also job-shop scheduling problems. In typical bottleneck congestion games, the utility costs of the players are determined by the worst congested resources that they use. However, the resulting Nash equilibria are inefficie...
متن کاملWeighted Congestion Games: Price of Anarchy, Universal Worst-Case Examples, and Tightness
We characterize the price of anarchy in weighted congestion games, as a function of the allowable resource cost functions. Our results provide as thorough an understanding of this quantity as is already known for nonatomic and unweighted congestion games, and take the form of universal (cost function-independent) worst-case examples. One noteworthy byproduct of our proofs is the fact that weigh...
متن کاملX Weighted Congestion Games: The Price of Anarchy, Universal Worst-Case Examples, and Tightness
We characterize the price of anarchy (POA) in weighted congestion games, as a function of the allowable resource cost functions. Our results provide as thorough an understanding of this quantity as is already known for nonatomic and unweighted congestion games, and take the form of universal (cost function-independent) worst-case examples. One noteworthy byproduct of our proofs is the fact that...
متن کاملRobust Price of Anarchy for Atomic Games with Altruistic Players
We study the inefficiency of equilibria for various classes of games when players are (partially) altruistic. We model altruistic behavior by assuming that player i’s perceived cost is a convex combination of 1−βi times his direct cost and βi times the social cost. Tuning the parameters βi allows smooth interpolation between purely selfish and purely altruistic behavior. Within this framework, ...
متن کامل